Esp. We may, but Capture One has a very poor API which makes automated testing much more difficult. These characteristics, together with an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a processor performs. My Ryzen 3950x is exporting images from Lightroom much slower recently using all 16 cores than using just 8 cores. Thanks Matt. I rely on Lightroom in managing, organising and displaying my photos, I shoot raw and I edit in both Lightroom and Photoshop. Macbook Pro, Vega 20 (i7 vs i9?) Between the Intel 10th Gen and AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen CPUs, most users are likely going to want an AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen processor due to their significantly better performance in tasks like exporting. Feel free to skip to the next sections for our analysis of these results to get a wider view of how each configuration performs in Lightroom Classic. For example: Ryzen 3700X and Ryzen 3800X - the exactly same processors, but difference in the frequency - 3800X have additional 300 MHz. ), Very interesting.I have made some tests om my PCSystem:Ryzen 3600 CPUAsus TUF B450-Pro Gaming motherboardZalman CNPS 14X cooler,Samsung 850 pro 250 GB SSDRAM: 1x HyperX DDR4-3333 16384MB PC4-26660 PredatorLatest Lightroom Classic 9.3, Export 180 pictures with adjustments - - with HT/SMT off takes 5 minutes 29 seconds. If you're using software that doesn't utilize hyper-threading well then the 9700K's extra cores and clock speed will make it a better value. Are these 24 files we can see on the LR screenshot? - Future Proofing Lightroom 5 months ago Hello. The thermal differences are an additional confounding factor, as you may be able to clock an 8700k or 8086k higher than a 9700k or 9900k. Intel Core i7-9700K 3.6GHz / 4.9GHz Turbo, Eight Core –> 132% Intel Core i9-9900K 3.6GHz / 5.0GHz Turbo, Eight Core –> 135% Adobe Creative Cloud Photography Plan I ordered another 2 sticks of the exact same Vulcan Z memory, since I've been contemplating on having 64 Gb total RAM anyways. Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. My current config is i7 6700K oc to 4.4GHz / GTX 750 / 16GB RAM / m.2 ssd for system / sata ssd for Adobe cache / hdd for photos. I NEVER delete anything. GPUs currently come with 2 to 8 GB of RAM. Good point about the overclocking and thermals. 85 % - with HT/SMT on takes 5 minutes 01 second. It’s i3 vs i5 vs i7 vs i9! Close • Posted by 1 hour ago. However, with the launch of Intel's new 10th Gen desktop processors, it is possible that Intel has fixed whatever is causing this performance issue (assuming that it is even related to the processor at all and not something in the software). So with 2 sticks of RAM (32GB) I was around 6:45, now with 4 sticks I'm back to 4:42, just where I was with my old 4x8GB RAM. All else being equal in your system, I believe that there will be no meaningful difference between the 8700k and 9700k once you optimize and overclock both CPUs. XMP profiles don't always properly set from what I've experienced. @Reid: yes, that would be my personal opinion. So far as I could tell his testing in that video was limited to the 9900K, and without hyper-threading the 9700K should actually run quite a bit cooler. I've just put another 32Gb RAM into my computer, making the total 64Gb, but more importantly, filling all 4 RAM slots again. I'm looking to upgrade my system and am looking at the i7-8700K, i7-9700K, or i7-8086K. Maybe the 8700 is still the best bet? To make a fair comparison, you have to control for these variables and test either at the same clock speeds, or same voltage, or temperatures. Money/quality wise, of course the most expensive one would be the best. By reading on this sub about undervolting I thought I'd give it a try and oh my, what a difference it makes! Matt, I know that it is impractical for you guys to test at overclocked speeds, but how do you think the 8700k will compare against the 9900k and 9700k when all are overclocked? This is frequent with new hardware generations, but appears to be more of an issue right now than I remember in years past. This may not be all that exciting, but this is fairly typical for CPU launches from Intel over the last few years. Considering the additional clock speed on top of that, if you're not overclocking, I think it comes back down to hyper-threading. No change in my test between SMT on or off.) Adobe Lightroom Classic is an interesting application when it comes to CPU performance since it has some very interesting performance quirks - chief among them the fact that AMD processors are overwhelming faster than Intel for a number of tasks like exporting and generating smart previews. We've done some testing with more photos and while it took longer to complete, it seems to be pretty pretty linear after you have more than just a few to export. So on Thursday I'll see if that changes anything. To start off our analysis of the Intel 10th Gen desktop processors we are going to look at the performance in Lightroom Classic versus AMD's 3rd Gen Ryzen processors. in warm weather, the fans go off almost immediately and after 20 min, it can be intolerable. Again, my personal take on these results is that the performance differences are largely due to the different stock turbo frequencies of the 8th gen and 9th gen chips. An update: it seems like we're facing the same old HT/SMT on vs. off situation again. The same problem persists if doing "Save Images" directly from Adobe Camera Raw (via either Bridge or Photoshop). I currently have a 8700k running at 5.0ghz all core. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also like to provide the individual results for you to examine. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark result/analysis sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion section. But I am worried, that it's not that future safe, since it doesn't offer hyperthreading. The graphs below compare the most important i9-9900K and Intel i7-8700 features. the puzzling results are still the same. For active tasks, however, the new Intel Core i9 10900K and Core i7 10700K both beat comparable or significantly more expensive AMD and Intel options. I would try rolling back to the previous version (in Creative Cloud, click the "..." and select "Other Versions"). In real world use, the limiting factor will be thermals for all of these chips, so that will be the most valid comparison. the image yielded the same times (between 5 to 7 seconds for the various tasks I threw at it. I don't OC myself, and there isn't much headroom on any of these chips. Any thoughts on whether the 2.3 ghz 9th generation i9 8 core processors will be worth the extra money over the 2.6 ghz 9th gen i7 6 core processors? BUT a couple of days ago I replaced the 4x8gb XPG 2800 ram with 2x16GB Vulcan Z 3200 ram. https://feedback.photoshop....I understand, it's rather atypical issue, but may be really architecture of this Ryzen processors such, that they show this results, as in your benchmark, and in the same time remains 10-20-30% unused CPU power.if this assumption (partially) true, it can change dramatically CPU preferences. Keep an eye out in the coming weeks (or months)! The new, slower results came after the update (I did downgrade to earlier versions of the Adobe apps to try, but still the same slow speed). Lightroom and Photoshop are the only things that I do that really tax my old PC, but it is sadly dying from old age and needs replaced. My feelings - with HT/SMT on, scrolling in Develop Module a bit quicker. Je suis en réflexion pour me monter une tour PC pour mes retouches photos (Photoshop) et tris/archives (Lightroom). At stock, the 9700k will be using more voltage, more wattage and will run hotter than the 8700k. The bulk tasks like exporting and generating smart previews are where we expected these CPUs to shine and while they were ~10% faster than the i7 8700K, we honestly thought we would see a larger difference. Also export, for example 50x jpeg (22 MP .CR2): Ryzen 7 3700X (slower processor) finished in 34.94 second, Ryzen 3800X (faster processor) finished with worse result (35.22 seconds)How it's possible? That way, anytime you launch Lightroom it can automatically have the affinity set to leave 1 or 2 cores unused for multitasking. The "Number of cores / threads" graph shows the number of cores (darker area). In comparison, the 9700k has a stock all-core turbo of 4.7ghz, so it is nearly maxed out at stock. Then after the RAM upgrade it slowed down to about 6:45 with the 2 x 16 = 32GB setup (2x16Gb T-Force Vulcan Z 3200 C16). Lightroom CC disgustingly slow - old issue, NEED ANSWERS. When running an export (or "Save Images" in ACR) with all 16 cores working (default scenario), the 3950x just doesn't seem to work hard enough. We make copies of the photos so that we have 100 images to export. I think that your findings of a 16% and 6% performance benefit for the 9900k for Photoshop and Lightroom may be overstating what real world results are going to be. It looks like that issue was before Lightrooom Classic was launched - they really improved performance in that new version of Lightroom. The new Core i9 9900K was at the top, but it was only a few percent faster than the i7 8700K which is likely within the margin of error for those tests. Even with SMT ON, I'm back to short export times (or "Save Images" times)! Nos tests précédents ont conclu que les graphiques étaient pratiquement inutilisés. if using masks, etc. I'm on a 2016 Macbook Pro w/ 16G RAM and LR can be so slow as to be unusable at times, esp. As far as we are aware, there has not been an official explanation as to why this is from Adobe, Intel, or AMD, but the fact of the matter is that if exporting is a bottleneck in your workflow, going with AMD can make exporting significantly faster. The scores shown in the chart above are relative to the best possible performance for each task with a Core i7 8700K CPU and a NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti 8GB GPU. Is there any chance that it's not so much a two versus four sticks of memory issue as it is a 32 versus 64 GB of memory capacity issue? So could it be because of going from 4 sticks of ram to 2? This is likely to be what the majority of readers are going to be interested in, so we decided to pull these results out from the full slew of results that are in the next section. It was about 2 min 30 sec faster than with SMT on. thanks Rob So a 7900X should be roughly twice as fast for exporting. But... the last couple versions of Lightroom Classic do much better with SMT/HT on for most of the "active" tasks like applying brushes, scrolling through images, etc. One thing we want to note is that the pre-launch motherboards we received from Gigabyte (and multiple other manufacturers) were not using Intel's specified power limits in their default BIOS settings. I expect some improvements with the i9 - … As this article states, the "the Core i7 9700K is about 4% faster that the Core i7 8700K" so the 8086 would be even less of a difference, but cost $30 more than the 8700. My understanding that for Lightroom the speed of the processor is important (got that) and that LR does not effectively use multiple cores. If you care more about performance when navigating and … It was 4:06. In fact, for most users there is little reason to use the more expensive i9 9900K as the i7 9700K is only a tiny bit slower. I work with an external monitor and tried any number of things to speed it up to no avail. Is the Intel Core 10th Gen or AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen better for Lightroom Classic? Or the Adobe update screwed up something (sometimes they're 2 steps froward, 1 step back)? Rotating, skewing, etc. So apparently, it does matter, at least on my computer, whether I use Lightroom, ACR, etc. Exporting the same batch from Lightroom yields the same results. On the architecture level, a 8700k core is exactly the same as a 9700k core (edit: with the exception of hyperthreading), so there is no objective reason why the 9700k should be 400mhz faster out of the box. HOWEVER, to complicate things more, there was also an Adobe update right after I installed the new RAM. much better at using a higher number of CPU cores, Samsung 960 Pro 1TB M.2 PCI-E x4 NVMe SSD, performs in other applications like Photoshop, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, Lightroom Classic CC 2018: Core i7 9700K & i9 9900K Performance. Somewhat slower is the 8 core, 16 thread (that's with SMT ON but manually turning cores off in the "Set Affinity" option in Task Manager). Yea, the SMT/HT thing still exists for exporting and making smart previews. Really the only times it'll matter is when doing maxed out stuff like exporting a ton of raw files from lightroom, and at that point you're looking at something taking 3:41 to export vs 3:59. Temperatures are about 8 degrees lower than when running only 8 cores. Lighter area on the graph corresponds to the number of extra threads, offered by Hyper-Threading technology. with 2 or 4 memory sticks. Overall, this will likely make the AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen processors a more attractive option for most Lightroom Classic users, although if exporting is not at all a problem in your workflow, the Intel 10th Gen processors can be a great choice as well. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ($499), Intel Core i9 9900K ($488) During export 12 cores loaded fully on the 99.99% . Photoshop Lightroom (standalone) is very slow. If you are interested in how these processors compare in other applications, we also have other articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, Photoshop, and several other applications available on our article listing page. Much less lag and delay. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. I hate noise, I only have one fan in my system and that's the CPU fan on an oversized heat sinc. Keep in mind that base clocks and turbo clocks are arbitrary. I bought this laptop 2 months ago (i7 9750H, 16GB, 512GB SSD, OLED 4K), my main use is for photography (Photoshop and Lightroom) and coming from an old Precision M4600 the difference is amazing. I know we usually test on 64 GB systems here at Puget. Contrary to William's comment about the 9th gen being able to overclock higher due to having better thermals, testing has shown this not to be the case. Meanwhile, the Core i9 version nailed a 19,516, making it 9.4 percent faster than the Core i7. Passant à des tests réels, nous n'avons constaté aucune différence dans Lightroom d'Adobe. So the SMT ON vs OFF phenomenon still persists, which makes sense to me. In the module tasks (scrolling through images and switching between the Library and Develop modules), there was surprisingly little difference between all the Intel CPUs we tested, although the AMD CPUs lagged behind just a bit. I've read many reports about the little difference between the i7 and i9 and I have become indecisive. Fascinating! However, I noticed that certain demanding active tasks are faster in the brand new ACR 12.3, such as adjusting an image after auto mask was already applied. The reason I ask is because there are many reports of Lightroom not performing well if the CPU has more than 4 physical cores. Je n'ai pas trouvé de réponses concrètes sur le site d'Adobe, ils ne donnent que des configurations "minimales". I understand your reasoning about the new CPUs having better thermal interface, which I guess they need because the run hotter. I am currently looking for a new computer and don't know which CPU to take. i7 9700K平均比i7 8700K快了4%。这个差异都是在导出和生成预览时产生的，在目录和开发模块它们的表现基本相同。 Core i9 9900K vs Core i7 8700K. Given the three I'm looking at and considering heat, thread, and clockspeed, would you still recommend the i9700? So the new memory is faster but produced slow export times with only 2 sticks. If Intel hadn't decided to launch the even faster Core i9 9900K, this would have been the fastest CPU we have ever tested for Photoshop. That may take the fun out of things for some people who enjoy overclocking, but the best case situation to me is one in which everyone can get the maximum performance without having to fiddle with motherboard settings :). Thank you! Lightroom Classic CC is much better at using a higher number of CPU cores than its predecessor, but for many tasks the speed of each core is often more important than the total number of cores. Tested it several times. For the i7 to i9 95% of peoples daily use it won't be any differnet. 90% sure. However, Lightroom Classic currently heavily favors AMD processors for passive tasks like exporting which allows the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3800X to be around 25-30% faster than the Core i9 10900K and i7 10700K respectively. Performance is very good and the OLED is simply stunning! And I know that some of the folks in videos like the one you posted above have that in mind. In Adobe Lightroom Classic, the Intel Core 10th Gen processors such as the i9 10900K and i7 10700K do very well in active tasks like scrolling through images and switch modules - coming in at about 5% faster than a similarly priced AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen CPU. The 9th gen chips have a higher stock turbo compared to the 8700k, but other reviews have found that the 9th gen 8-core chips also run significantly hotter, which reduces maximum overclocking potential. Wow, 3:30. Will be returning it this week, unless the i9 proves to be worse than the i7 at anything. The Intel 10th Gen Core i9 10900K and i7 10700K are a bit better for active tasks, but for most, it will be worth giving up a barely noticeable performance gain in these tasks for close to a 2x improvement in export performance. Interesting, Jayz2cents had much better results oc'ing the 9900K compared to the 8700K: https://youtu.be/9yQRmbe2QPU. I have BIG catalogs- 30K to 100K images. AMD vs Intel is always a popular discussion, so we included the Ryzen 7 2700X - which tends to be cheaper than either of these new CPUs - as well as the Threadripper 1920X which is similar in price to the i9 9900K. Close to that results is the 8 cores and 16 threads setup (SMT ON but manually turning half the cores off). In this article, we will be examining the performance of the new Intel 10th Gen Core i9 10900K, i7 10700K, and i5 10600K in Lightroom Classic compared to a range of CPUs including the AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Intel X-10000 Series, AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, as well as the previous generation Intel 9th Gen processors. Never tested the new RAM with the pre-update Adobe. Now, I just need to run a test with SMT OFF and 4 sticks of RAM. With the launch of the new 9th Gen Intel Core Processors, Intel has made a number of improvements including a small frequency bump and an increase in core count. CPU utilization we typically don't log during these benchmarks since from a performance perspective, it is often more misleading then helpful. For these tasks, the Intel 10th Gen processors take the lead with the Intel Core i9 10900K and i5 10700K beating the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and 3800X by a small 5% respectively. (I consider it unlikely). It will be helpful.But my main thought, or assumption was such: May be CPU utilization in AMD Ryzen 2700X during export (which may take many hours for thousands of pictures) not 99%, as in I7 processors (definitely for I7-2600K), but just 60-70-80 % ? Definitely something we are keeping an eye on, but at the moment it looks like the amount of time we would have to dedicate to doing the testing wouldn't make it financially viable for us to do at the moment. I think we're getting close with this generation, and you can see that by the fact that there is so little overhead to overclock further without having to crank the voltage up and deal with massive amounts of heat. Even if the exporting performance still isn't on par with AMD, it is also possible that these new processors will be significantly faster for active tasks like scrolling through images, switching modules, applying adjustments, etc, which may make them ideal for photographers that do heavier edits on a smaller number of images. One additional thing to note though, the new 9000 Series CPUs may be somewhat hard to find for a while. profile (2800 MHz and 3200 MHz respectively), no stability issues. Esp. This benchmark version includes the ability to upload the results to our online database, so if you want to know how your own system compares, you can download and run the benchmark yourself. Might be a problem with the latest Lightroom Classic version. We just already had a bunch of results already on Z370 before that board came in so we stuck with it rather than having to re-run a bunch of testing. And when you overclock the Core i9, it outputs 21,204, which is a 16.8 percent increase over the Core i7. This isn't anything new, but now that Intel is being more aggressive about adding cores and pushing the frequency, this is resulting in much higher power draw (and heat) than you would expect from a 125W processor - often resulting in 100c temperatures after only a few seconds of load. Between AMD and INtel, if you have a similar number of cores I don't think you should see all that different of CPU load unless there is an issue with your system. Can you give me a rough estimate? I think everybody is happy to take a faster active task set (and slower export) over a fast export and slow(er) active tasks. If you are hitting peak CPU utilization, that is actually good from a performance perspective, but I totally understand how it can cause issue with multitasking. It's looks for me, that results is incorrect. For most users, this makes the AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen processors a much better overall choice for a Lightroom Classic workstation. Mac, Lightroom, i5 or i9? The new i7 9700K and i9 9900K are certainly good for Lightroom Classic CC, but they are only about 5% faster than the i7 8700K on average. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each type of task, we also wanted to provide the individual results in case there is a specific task someone may be interested in. I have seen issue with Ryzen 1800X, where CPU utilization during export was just about 30%. The 8700 is currently 100 € cheaper than the 9700k, is it worth 100 € more? Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. will you ever do a Benchmarking for Capture one? If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. So 2 things changed: new Ram, and new versions of Adobe applications. Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. https://uploads.disquscdn.c... Hi! Also there is a difference in that the lower spec machine has the Radeon Pro 5300M graphics while the other has the 5500M. If your software does use hyper-threading effectively, it'll be a more even match. This further reduces any potential performance gains by the 9th gen chips, as you are trading clock speeds for extra cores. That is why we keep it on for our testing - most people will likely be willing to take the hit in export times in order to make the active tasks a bit faster. Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Lightroom Classic and that performance will vary widely in different applications. Core i7 9700K vs Core i7 8700K. Lightroom is my bottleneck- its soslow its annoying. To get an idea of whether or not purchasing a more expensive Intel CPU would give you a notable increase in performance, we also include the i7 7820X and the i9 7900X. Since Lightroom tends to value both core count and frequency, these new CPUs should do great but the only way to know for sure is to actually benchmark them and find out.

Beste Klinik Für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie Hamburg, Wassertemperatur Ostsee Rügen Göhren, Kakegurui Staffel 2, Quartier 21 öffnungszeiten, Festool Aktionen 2020, Wetter Achern De, I5-3570k Vs Amd Ryzen 7 3700x, Asus Rgb Software,