As for the future, only the developers could tell you.4) No way to really know. I also know Puget Systems recommendations for RAM frequency but in the real world there are many out there with 3600 Mhz or more, see Puget systems database results :-) My working settings are moderate CL 16-18-18-38 2933 Mhz. With that really quick look at workstation performance out-of-the-way, we can move onto a look at gaming performance – aka: the true reason for this article’s existence today. Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. AMD hasn't added any more cores to their new line of processors, but among other things, they are touting a 19% IPC (instructions per clock) improvement. Listed below are the specifications of the systems we will be using for our testing: *All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of October 26, 2020. We don't re-use results from previous testing (or do so very rarely and clearly mark them), and since performance changes over time, that means that the 9900K will pretty much never hit exactly the same scores that it did on that specific day. Comparing applications is something we don't really try to do since there is so much more to why you would use one application over another than straight performance. At a glance then it would appear that all of the systems reviewed here are notably slower than that old 9900k test rig - which is clearly incorrect. It’s the Mac Pro that’s *REALLY* bad. At the first look it seems like there can't be more than 5% but :-): RAMDual rank -> Single rank2 DIMM -> 4 DIMMDaisy Chain -> T-Topology2666 Mhz -> 3600Mhz -> 4400 MhzCL 19-19-19-19 -> CL-14-15-15AMD -> INTEL, Resolution1980 + 1020 -> 2560 x 1440 -> 3840 x 2160. Comparing the 5600X to the more similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K, the 5600X is a decent 11% faster in our Lightroom Classic benchmark. Hey! While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also like to provide the individual results for you to examine. The $/performance looks amazing for a Ryzen 3900 powered Lightroom workstation. 2) Should I expect my PC to continue to lock up with either of these CPU’s? For years, neither Intel nor AMD have done anything to really justify an upgrade. Benchmark. Now I can just take a small break and get back to work. Since the 5600x isn't out yet, there's no testing to indicate if it's supposed faster single core speed will help improve performance in Lightroom over a CPU like the 3700x, which is around the same price but has 2 more cores/4 more threads. Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Lightroom Classic. 9.2 is at least 4 times slower than the last V8 release. I will quote from your Lightroom benchmark procedure : How does the scoring work?The scoring system used in our benchmark is based on the performance relative to a reference system with the following specifications: Intel Core i9 9900K 8 CoreNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB64GB of RAMSamsung 960 Pro 1TBWindows 10 (1903)Adobe Lighroom Classic CC 2019 (ver. Should you choose the new Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core CPU or the Intel i9 9900K 8-core? For comparison, both the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12 Core and Intel Core i9 9900K 8 Core have a MSRP of $499. If your workflow includes other software packages, you need to consider how the processor will perform in all those applications. The differents can be mor den 40% !!! Lightroom Classic is not an easy application to directly benchmark, but we hope to have a publicly available version for download in the coming months. However, since Intel is launching their new Core X-10000 series processors and AMD is launching their new 3rd Gen Threadripper processors in the near future, we are only going to compare the 3950X to a handful of Intel and AMD CPUs. I think above a small GPU upgrade, you are going to be bottlenecked by your CPU. I see that the 'active score' benchmarks are all under 100. Lightroom is hard to benchmark since the things that are easiest to test (importing, exporting, generating previews, etc.) And that '100' benchmark was established with a 9900k system. I haven't seen any benchmarks on the Ryzen CPUs, don't go by the hype, find some benchmarks. Things have actually changed a bit regarding HT/SMT with Lightroom Classic V9.0 . The thing is, Ryzen isn’t really impressive at all in terms of performance. I'm sure the hardware itself has an impact as well. Screen resolution is easier, but it also more complicated than it sounds. Multi displays can make it really hard to tell what the actual screen resolution is if there are different display resolutions in use, as does different DPI settings. Generally though, most people don't upgrade their CPU every generation since the performance gains usually aren't enough to warrant it. There are quite a few things we want to test in LrC, but unfortunately the API is way behind other apps like Photoshop and Premiere Pro. Even if we do out own testing on older platforms, nothing is ever going to be as accurate as comparing the performance of the exact system you are using today to whatever the latest hardware is. In fact, this is the speed we are planning on using in our Ryzen workstations once JDEC DDR4-2933 16GB sticks are available. And it's not always straightforward and faster and 100% utilized with more cores etc, as export is.Also it helps import previews and develop module when you make and apply a some preset with Sharpening and Noise Reduction set to 0. From what your headaches are, the Threadripper 3960X is probably the way to go. We've tried to work with the devs to add the functionality we need, but it can be hard to find time to add features that help us when they are busy tackling bugs and adding features that are useful for their end users. Even with all the improvements Adobe has done in the last couple of Lightroom versions to take advantage of the GPU, it is still primarily a CPU-driven application. We are working on getting the benchmark up for download. Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. Having said that, for Lightroom ONLY (and not other Adobe software, which I cannot comment on), you want the fastest 4-core CPU you can afford. You are of course free to do whatever you want with your own system, but we've always taken the stance that reliability is more important than getting a bit more performance since in a production environment, system crashes and lost work costs far more money than losing a few percent performance. Posted by 1 year ago. The difference shouldn't be more than 40% though. I see, it's difficult and very interesting. Thank you for such a competent and detailed reply. I would believe that scaling goes way down after 6 cores though. Er schafft den Test in 119 Sekunden und kostet gerade mal 370 Euro.. Der Intel Core i7-8700K kostet ähnlich wenig, braucht aber für den Parcours 195 Sekunden.. Ist sieht also so aus, als ob ein aktueller AMD Ryzen Prozessor eine sehr gute und preisgünstige Wahl für Lightroom ist. The second thing to note is that we are using our soon to be released Lightroom Classic Benchmark. Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. One thing we do want to note is that the pre-launch BIOS that is available for Ryzen motherboards is using AGESA 1.0.8. Overall, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is currently the fastest CPU we have tested for Lightroom Classic, but the extra 5% performance over the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X for a 50% increase in cost is likely to be hard to justify for most users. I dont understand why the 9900K is not 1000. Compared to the Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core or Core i9 9900K, you are looking at close to a 25-30% increase in performance! That is the same reason we use a NVMe storage drive as well. Feel free to skip to the next sections for our analysis of these results to get a wider view of how each configuration performs in Lightroom Classic. If your workflow includes other software packages (we have similar articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, and Photoshop), you need to consider how the system will perform in those applications as well. On my system, for the Develop sliders (the only performance characteristic I care about as I spend 90+% of my Lightroom time dragging sliders), V9.1 was a slowdown and 9.2 a huge slowdown. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. So in general, it should be better overall to leave SMT on currently. Its a strong alternative to lightroom and it has better performance, but I can´t seem to find how it responds to different hardwareGreat article BTW :D. Capture One is on our list, but it honestly will likely be at least a year or longer before we are able to take it on - we have a few other major project to take on first. If you were to compare AMD and Intel processors based on price alone, AMD is anywhere from 11% to 30% faster than Intel. Or does there exist a “political correctness” problem with Adobe? In my case, switching between to Monitors (separately connected and separately tested on the same PC) 1980 + 1020 -> 2560 x 1440 (AMD RX570 4GB) gives me a difference of 17% in some important Tasks! 2) The system shouldn't lock up, but if it does, you can always do some trickery with Windows affinity so that Lightroom isn't allowed to use a handful of CPU cores. With the launch of AMD's new Ryzen 5000-series processors, however, it is very likely that AMD will be able to take a very solid lead over Intel in Lightroom Classic no matter what task you are looking at. Quite often I have to let my computer sit there over night while it churns out previews… I don’t want to do that. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Gaming Performance. In theory, this could translate to almost a 20% performance increase over the previous generation, although it will likely heavily depend on the application. The officially supported RAM speed varies from DDR4-2666 to DDR4-3200 depending on how many sticks you are using and whether they are dual or single rank, and DDR4-2933 is right in the middle as well as being the fastest supported speed if you want to use four sticks of RAM. I'm having a blast editing 4K content in Premiere, but Lightroom? Posted on 2020-03-16 07:14:10. Right now our plate is pretty full, but that is pretty close to the top of my to-do list. Thanks for the reply. Hence the attraction of a single slot card. With the higher-end Ryzen models, we are looking at roughly a 14% increase in performance over the Core i9 10900K with the Ryzen 7 5800X, or a 21% increase with the Ryzen 9 5900X. Now, AMD is launching one more 3rd generation Ryzen CPU - the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. Hello AMD! Can you confirm this?• Compared to your roundup on October 16, 2019, the NEF export of the 3900X is suddenly considerably slower - by 35%! This link shows Strong Ryzen's Performance : V-ray RT That Lightroom's Link is all about performance between CC / 2015 Version , Some Test show weak result from New Version , like this one even Ryzen 1800 is on par with Intel 7900X ==> Link So Don't expect too much from Ryzen when ST / Clock / AVX 512 is on High Priority . Wanted to ask - will there be benchmarking series, where the new amd GPUs are used in tandem with the new CPUs and SAM on, i am curious weather there is any performance gain to be found outside of games. We used to test 1:1 preview generation, but it wasn't something supported by the API so we had to drop it when we made the benchmark available for public download. For a number of reasons which I won't go into here, there is a preference for Quadro cards. So stay tuned on that! Display resolution I don't have an article to back it up (yet), but from what I've seen the difference is at most 5-10%. Their lead over Intel was not small either, the Ryzen 9 3900X was a very impressive 22% faster than the Intel Core i9 9900K in our Lightroom Classic benchmark. The Ryzen 7 3700X is the next step up from the Ryzen 5 3600X in terms of performance and price. I'm currently speccing up a new desktop build to mostly run Lightroom and Photoshop, and have read elsewhere that there are good gains in memory performance by using 3600Mhz ram with CL16 or CL18 timing. great job again with yours online database, but! They do have a 10-20% higher price tag as well, although in terms of absolute cost that works out to only a $50 increase which is fairly small if you look at it as a part of the overall cost of a computer. PugetBench V0.8 BETA for Lightroom Classic, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. 16gb ram and gtx1080. We will be publishing more articles as these new processors launch, so be sure to keep a close eye on our list of Hardware Articles in the coming weeks. The K1200 is a pretty old GPU, so you should notice some difference with the newer versions of Lightroom Classic where they have been improving GPU acceleration support. Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. I have BIG catalogs- 30K to 100K images. Thanks for the info on Lightroom's inability to use SMT. Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. For the Crowd - The overall result of active and passive tasks are indicators. Iknow, i know, it's a little bit malicious :-). Lightroom is my bottleneck- its soslow its annoying. Over the last few years, AMD has been making great strides with their Ryzen and Threadripper processors, often matching - or beating - the performance from similarly priced Intel options. it is very hard to know where you stand with performance on your current system. This processor features a staggering 16 CPU cores which is really starting to blur the line between "consumer" and "HEDT" (High End Desktop) processors. That is definitely something I want to look at! If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles to keep up to date on how all of these software packages - and more - perform with the latest CPUs. How is the performance? CL timings are really hard (impossible from what I have found so far) to get directly at the level we have access to through the various Adobe APIs. Puget Systems Lightroom Classic Benchmark. Archived. I also see bad performance in Lightroom classic where I exported from ARW to JPG 397 files (the same files with the same edit on both systems) with quality set to 80 and got these times: 7820x: 16 min 21 sek. The average of 87.7 and 96.5 is 92.1, which x10 is 921. Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. At a recent event, Intel ran a comparison using Adobe Lightroom that showed better performance on a Tiger Lake i7-118G7 machine versus one equipped with a Ryzen 4800U. As far as performance relative to older systems, that is something we've done in the past and want to do more of - we just don't have the bandwidth to do that in addition to keeping up with the latest hardware and software updates. Why?• Video Card: Is it really meaningful to use a graphics card that would normally not be installed in a Lightroom computer (RTX 2080 Ti)? Ryzen 3000 series Lightroom performance? and "passive" tasks (exporting, generating smart previews, etc.). Also, waiting for the LR benchmark. That seems huge considering we only see 5-15% gains between CPU generations. It's actually slower on the new setup, and I see many people complaining about Lightroom's bad performance on CPUs with more than four cores. Granted, I’m importing thousands of RAW files at a time and exporting hundreds of JPG’s (the life of a family photographer on the beach). There is no need for that high-end of a GPU, but in the off chance that it does make an impact, we want to make sure that the performance is being primarily limited by the CPU rather than another component. Lightroom: cache size 500GB catalogue size 5-6gb library 6tb Settings and library is identical. This limits the Ryzen platform to 64GB of RAM while the other platforms had 128GB, but since our Lightroom Classic benchmark never needs more than 32GB of RAM to run, this does not affect performance at all. Definitely enough to skew results, which is why our own internal testing with locked down configurations is always going to be more reliable than publicly uploaded results. However, your testing (Messy Memory Speed Standards) showed an overall increase of 9% in Lightoom compared with the slower 2666Mhz memory. Turning off SMT can improve performance a bit in tasks like exporting, but in the last few versions of LrC, it also lowers performance in active tasks. Our Lightroom Classic benchmark tests a wide range of tasks that are divided between "active" tasks (scrolling through images, brush lag, etc.) PC spec, X470 Aorus latest bios. The API is about as barebones as it could possibly be which makes it really difficult to get a benchmark created that isn't going to constantly break. Since this testing was completed, Premiere Pro 14.2 released with some huge GPU performance improvements. Feel free to skip to the next section for our analysis of these results if you rather get a wider view of how each CPU performs in Lightroom Classic. In the past, there were arguments for using an Intel processor for Lightroom Classic if you wanted to optimize for active tasks like scrolling through images, but with the new Ryzen 5000-series CPUs, AMD takes a solid lead no matter the task.

Uni Bielefeld Bewerbung, Hometogo Ostsee Mit Hund, Nals Ferienwohnung Mit Pool, Uni Ranking Deutschland Informatik, Fh Bielefeld Einschreibung, Preise Essen Cala Ratjada, Luxusurlaub Mit Hund Deutschland, Kfu Graz Jobs, Mall Of Berlin Massimo Dutti, Ph-online Wien Login,